On Monday 21 November 2005 20:19, Rico -mc- Gloeckner wrote: > > This is a compiler bug and has nothing to do with the sources, it may > even indicate faulty RAM or similar.
It's almost surely a compiler bug, faulty RAM does not produce the same error everytime, expecially between reboots. > Which can be workarounded by commenting one block (though iam not sure > wether denying the skb_dup causes harm, the dereferend packet may be > needed later when the packet in the buffer itself was freed), and by the > other location the listname need to be named instead of just skb->list. I removed the skb->list requirement altogether to support kernel 2.6.14. Bye, -- Daniele Orlandi _______________________________________________ Visdn-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers
