On 2012/06/14 5:45, Russ Housley wrote:
The current draft says:

2.3.  Audio

  Audio from face-to-face meetings travels in two directions: from the
  room to remote attendees, and (potentially) from remote attendees to
  the room.  Comments on early drafts of this document indicated that
  the latter may not really be a requirement for all attendees if IM-
  to-mic is made predictable.  Given this, reliable IM-to-mic relay for
  comments to speakers is highest priority, audio from remote attendees
  giving presentations is a second priority, and audio from remote
  attendees giving comments to the room is a third priority.

I want to make sure that this represents the community consensus.

My summary:

(1) We have good audio from the room to the remote participant.  Keep doing 
that.

I agree with others that this is far from being the case. The usual delays (20' or thereabouts) are way too large for a timely feedback loop, either with voice back or via jabber. These delays are very valuable for archiving, but that's about it. (If we are talking about Meetecho, then that's a different story.)

(2) IM-to-mic is working pretty well too.  Keep doing that, but there might be 
some improvements that could be made.

There are some good examples, but also many others. Things are far from solved.

(3) Don't do audio to the meeting room for anyone except a remote presenter for 
quite some time.

I'm mixed on this. My experience as a remote presenter in the past few meetings has been quite mixed. As long as it's that error-prone to get remote presenters hooked up correctly, I'm indeed not sure it makes sense to also voice-connect others. However, I think that if we are serious about this, we can do a much better job ("this is the number to call, or the application/Web page to start up", and it just works), and then it shouldn't be that much of a problem to get others than presenters connected, and their input would be valuable.

Regards,    Martin.

Russ
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet

Reply via email to