This note does not seem to specify details for remote
participation in the remote hub discussion. Much as I would
welcome the extra sleep, dare I suggest that not having
arrangements for remote participation in this discussion would
be, at best, a little ironic?
john
--On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 13:30 +0000
[email protected] wrote:
> Vmeet,
> This is the room assignment and final agenda for the Bar BOF
> in Yokohama to discuss the idea of Remote Hubs. It will be
> in Room 419 but the time will be Thursday, Nov. 5th
> 7:45am-8:45am. Calendar file attached. Breakfast will NOT
> be provided. (Sorry!) Please let me know any questions
> you may have. Agenda
> ------
> 1. We come up with some templates for remote hubs in our
> meeting 2. We have some goals for remote hubs for IETF95.
> For example: U.S. : 5 hubs Latin / South America: 5
> hubs India : 5 hubs ... etc.
> A hub can decide which remote hub template they want to use.
> 3. Sister hubs : hub-to-hub interaction. Should this be
> done, if so, how? 4. We do an I-D describing our thoughts (due
> date: Jan. 1st, 2016) 5. We post the I-D on the IETF
> discussion list for comments. (Due date: Jan 10, 2016) 6.
> We try to meet our goals for remote hubs! (Due date:
> February 15, 2016) Issues---------
> 1. Many people cannot afford to attend IETF meetings live.
> 2. It can be more interesting and useful to attend remote
> meetings as a group. The face-to-face (F2F) interaction adds
> a great deal to the overall process. 3. Some regions (Latin
> America, India) have already started remote hubs. We can
> learn from each other. 4. We are starting Regional
> Mentoring. Such mentors can work with remote hubs. Thanks,
> Nalini ElkinsInside Products, Inc.www.insidethestack.com(831)
> 659-8360
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
