There's potential use there at either the code sprint or hackathon. I could see
how some either team could definitely include remote participants.
Tony
On 4/10/16, 9:27 AM, "vmeet on behalf of [email protected]"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>
>Dan York <[email protected]> writes:
>> John,
>>> Serious debugging _during_ IETF-week really doesn't make sense;
>>> but we ought to do it
>>
>> I agree... BUT... I wonder if we can actually replicate the necessary
>> conditions outside of during an actual IETF week. It seems to me the loads
>> on the Meetecho servers and network may only be possible during an event
>> week... But there may be other ways to add load.
>
>Perhaps if there was an announced testing/debugging sessions on Fri or
>Sat prior we could get a lot of people to join. Friday would be best b/c
>people then could be at work (possibly) replicating what their actual
>experience would be the following week, but that might be too early
>for the IETF on-site end of things.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
