[email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > I believe that we should have a short term and long term goal. > > Short term, since Chicago is literally upon us, I would say, let the > remote hub meet in any way that it can.
Just to emphasize: Remote-hubs that can't offer 8 conference rooms should offer what they can and see how many folks they attract. > Long term, sure, let's figure out how to do it best. s/best/better > A number of us put thoughts down for remote hubs as Internet Drafts, if > those drafts are helpful, great. If people want to start over, also great. I don't like "start over"... We should at least glance through those drafts. If there's a different concentration that deserves a new draft, start typing... > But, the important thing at the moment is to connect with the people in > the affected countries: Iran, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen and Libya. If I know any of these folks, I don't recall talking or exchanging email with them. Those who do know some, please invite them into this discussion. > What we need to do is to find a contact in each of the countries who can > serve as a focal point. If people agree, I can start a conversation > about this on the IETF-Africa list. Please do. > But, that does not take care of Iran, Iraq, Syria & Yemen. If we arrange a good Remote Hub in Europe or Asia, that _would_ help. > ISOC has had Fellows from that region, maybe ISOC needs to be involved > in this conversation. If we can attract some ISOC folks, that would be great. -- John Leslie <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
