Thanks all, very helpful info. Alissa > On Mar 23, 2017, at 2:43 PM, Christian O'Flaherty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > we’re learning about Remote Hubs (how to organize them, the impact, the > tools, etc.). It’s still work in progress... that’s why each one is different > and each of us may have different ideas and expectations. > > more below > >> On 3/23/17, 2:12 AM, "vmeet on behalf of Alissa Cooper" >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Alissa: >> >> Hi! >> >> Responding from the LATAM point of view. I’m cc’ing Christian explicitly >> because he may have more information. >> >> >> I have reviewed the drafts about remote hubs and I have a few questions for >> those who have been involved in them to date. I have not been tracking this >> closely until now so I appreciate your help in getting me up-to-speed. >> >> 1) Has there been any tracking of the activity in remote hubs? E.g., the >> names of people who show up or how many people show up per hub and for which >> WG sessions? If not, is there a sense of whether those organizing remote >> hubs would be open to tracking such data and sharing it with the IAOC and >> secretariat so that we can build a consistent picture over time of how >> participation is evolving globally at these hubs? >> >> Yes. In general we’ve encouraged the hubs to “sign the blue sheet”, and in >> some cases have even submitted some of them (specially at the first hub >> experiment in Hawaii). Of course, ymmv. On line blue sheets would be >> ideal. >> >> Encouraging official registration as remote participant I think helps the >> IAOC/secretariat already. >> >> >> 2) For hubs that have been available for multiple meetings in the same >> locations, does it tend to be the case that the same folks show up time and >> again (for the same or similar working groups), or is there a lot of >> turnover from meeting to meeting? >> >> I think we’ve had the opposite experience than Vinayak: remote hubs based in >> academia have been the most consistent, mostly in topics/WGs. >> >> >> 3) Have remote hubs been used for participation in interim meetings or >> virtual interim meetings? >> >> Not as far as I know. >> >> 4) Other than on the existing dedicated hub lists and the remote hubs page >> on ietf.org <http://ietf.org/>, how/where is the existence of remote hubs >> advertised? Any other local lists? >> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > and we also encourage the local organizers to promote their hubs among their > contacts or local mailing lists. > >> >> >> 5) I see the remote hubs page for IETF 98 listed at >> <https://www.ietf.org/registration/MeetingWiki/wiki/doku.php?id=98remotehubs >> <https://www.ietf.org/registration/MeetingWiki/wiki/doku.php?id=98remotehubs>>, >> but for some past meetings I see these listed in different places on the >> meeting wiki, or not listed at all. Am I correct that there has not been a >> consistent URL for the remote hubs list? >> >> Yes. It’s still work in progress. Christian gets better every time! J > > Nowadays is made by hand with some google forms + copy & paste to the wiki. > > We'll try to have something better for the next meeting. > If someone is willing to help, please Join Codesprint > https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF98SprintSignUp > <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF98SprintSignUp> >> >> 6) Have any remote hubs on academic or corporate campuses been used for >> participants to connect during non-business hours (e.g., late at night)? How >> have people dealt with getting building access off-hours? Has this been a >> barrier to getting hubs setup in locations where there was demand from a >> group of people to join a meeting off-hours? >> >> Yes. Yes, time difference is the most obvious barrier to remote hubs. > > We do not promote remote hubs when the time difference is not appropriate > (there were no remote hubs in LAC for Seoul and there are no remote hubs in > Africa scheduled for Chicago. The rationale is that the objective is to > improve the experience for remote participants and moving during the night is > the oposite. > > Christian > >> >> >> Alvaro. >> >> >
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
