I think I have to do the Hipersockets because the Linux will be running UDB. There will be applications running on VM 4.3 that will need to access the data managed by
the UDB (that is running under Linux that is running under VM 5.1, etc.).
Steve
| Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions <[email protected]> 10/12/2005 03:00 PM
|
To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Re: attn. Hipersocket/LPAR/IFL guru's |
I configuration like this will purposely route any packets intended for
z/VM 5.1 and Linux through the z/VM 4.3 system. That's fine if you are
trying to insulate z/VM 5.1.
If you want both VMs to have access to the network as equals, it is just
easiest to give them each OSA devices and set up a Vswitch for the Linux
guests. Save the Hipersockets for interLPAR communications.
Steve Gentry wrote:
>
> I know this probably isn't the list for this question but I figure it
> would get to the largest audience. We are in the process of installing
> an IFL running VM 5.1 running Linux..
> I've been a single LPAR kind of guy all of my life and am a newbie at
> setting up this type of configuration. Below is a picture of what I
> want to do.
>
>
>
> Can I configure something like this or is there a better/different way
> to do this? IP addresses have intentionally been left out at this point.
> Thanks,
> Steve
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Main: (262)392-2026
Cell: (414)491-6001
Ans Service: (360)715-2467
rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2006 - Chattanooga, TN - April 7-11, 2006
