On Thursday, 10/20/2005 at 07:35 EST, Berry van Sleeuwen 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> overlapping the warmstartarea is a disaster waiting to happen. Couldn't
> they be protected in the same way as the SPOOL, PAGE and TDISK? By CP
> instead of a minidisk in the directory.

We've been looking at ways to get CP to protect itself better from 
accidental destruction by the sysprog.  I'll add this one to the list to 
think about.

More than likely, CP won't be able to prevent the definition of such 
minidisk overlays, but could refuse to instantiate them.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott

Reply via email to