Title: Concurrent Use of IBM ATL and STK silo under CA VMTAPE

We're planning on concurrent use of an IBM ATL library and a STK silo on a zVM system.
Both have 3590 tapes and tape drives.
We use CA's VMTAPE as our tape mgmt system.

If anyone is using a similar setup, did you need to code COMMAND and/or ALLOCATE VMTAPE exits?
Can you share a copy of these exits with us?
My initial thought is "keying off" the volser to direct the drive allocation, if exit(s) needed.
I need to ensure that a requested 3590 tape, scratch or saved, is mounted on a tape drive in the correct tape library.

Thank you,
Roger

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein.  If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.  Thank you for your co-operation.

Reply via email to