Actually, I tried: 192.168.2.0/23 192.168.50.1 ETH1 8192
first, but got the message: DTCPRS158E Line 75: Subnet Mask specified on GATEWAY statement is not valid The doc says the mask length can have a value from 1-32, but already figured that was either an error in the code, my understanding, or some unknown configuration parameter for CIDR. I'll open a PMR on both. Brian Nielsen On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:42:48 -0500, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Friday, 01/13/2006 at 04:12 CST, Brian Nielsen ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> As an excercise, I thought I could supernet these 2 into 1 like this: >> >> 192.168.2.0 255.255.254.0 192.168.50.1 ETH1 8192 >> >> but when I do I get the following error message: >> >> DTCPAR123I Line 75: Unknown link name in GATEWAY cmd > >Curious. Does 192.168.2.0/23 work? > >> I looked for, but didn't find, any TCPIP parameters that might need to >be >> turned on related to CIDR. > >There aren't any. > >> What am I overlooking? > >Miguel's the specialist on this, but it looks ok to me. Please open a PMR >as there's certainly nothing wrong with the link name! :-) Thanks. > >Alan Altmark >z/VM Development >IBM Endicott >=========================================================================
