On Thursday, 01/19/2006 at 12:13 EST, Miguel Diaz/Endicott/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

> Eek...I was hoping to respond to this before you got here ;-) 
> 
> The book does in fact say that the OBEYFILE must containg the entire 
PORT 
> statement etc. 
> 
> That's not correct (and it is being fixed). 
> 
> There is currently no way, without taking the stack down, to remove a 
PORT 
> specification.

Well, I could have sworn I've done it before, but then I am old and 
feeble, with a poor memory.  Who am I to argue with the person who is now 
trapped in the golden amber of the parser?  ;-)

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott

Reply via email to