I cannot reproduce your problem on either z/VM 5.1.0 or z/VM 5.2.0. What 

platform are you sending from? I would expect the date and time on the 

file to be the current date and time, regardless of the original data on 

the file. At least that is what I see doing:

ftp node
userid
password
cd ackerman rdr
put profile.exec
quit

rdrlist
receive / profile exec2

(Putting the file in my own reader.)

On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:50:19 -0500, Stracka, James (GTI) 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I do not think so.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Harding, Mike
>Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 2:37 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: Wrong Century in RECEIVE of FTP to RDR
>
>
>I would guess that your ftpserve has access to a really moldy version of

>NETDATA and/or DMSDDL module. 
>
>
>Mike Harding
>EDS VM National Capability
>134 El Portal Place
>Clayton, Ca.  USA  94517-1742
>
>* phone: +01-925-672-4403
>*  Fax: +01-925-672-4403
>* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   * <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>(personal)
>Note:  For 2006, I am off on Mondays with even Julian dates and Fridays
>with odd ones.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of James G. Stracka
>Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 9:51 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Wrong Century in RECEIVE of FTP to RDR
>
>We are upgrading TCP/IP from 4.4.0 to 5.1.0.
>
>When I PUT a file to my virtual reader then did a receive, it put in the

>wrong century, 1906 instead of 2006, when received to disk using the
>5.1.0 TCPIP FTP.  The 4.4.0 works as expected.
>
>When the PUT was directly to disk, the date was correct.
>
>i.e.
>
>listfile runtask* exec (d
>FILENAME FILETYPE FM FORMAT LRECL   RECS   BLOCKS     DATE     TIME
>SAMPLETO READER   A1 V         68     45        1  2/07/1906 10:53:16
>SAMPLETO DISK     A1 V         68     45        1  2/07/2006 11:00:05
>
>q dateformat
>User Dateformat = FULLDATE
>
>
>I thought I remembered that we had to do something for this way back
>when but just cannot think what it was.  Do you have any idea?
>
>Jim
>--------------------------------------------------------
>
>If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the 

sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retai
n 
or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to
 
this e-mail.     http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
>--------------------------------------------------------
>========================
=========================
=======================

Reply via email to