At 6:53 PM -0600 3/16/05, Ken Williams wrote:
I don't understand - where are those tests? They're not part of PathTools' distribution. Also, how are you sure that these failures
>> are caused by PathTools and not some other code?
I may have made in error in how I merged the files in. Other than the Pathtools merge, this is a stock Perl 5.8.6 on OpenVMS 8.2 with defaults taken on the configure.com.
It is possible that I replaced a file that should not have been replaced. I simply found all the files that were obviously for the same purpose in the 5.8.6 kit and replaced them with the PathTools 3.05 equivalents if they were different.
I believe what he's done is taken Perl 5.8.6, merged PathTools 3.05 into it and run the core test suite. The before and after results he's showing are the core test suite results before and after upgrading PathTools. But without detailed results of what's failiing and why in the "after" case, I don't know if there's anything we can act on.
What details do you need and how to I get them?
The is_deeply test when I run it by it self is passing all 22 tests, however one test is generating some text explaining that it succeeded. That explanation is not being preceded by "#" characters like I have noticed on other tests.
lib/Test/Simple/t/fail-like..........FAILED at test 2 lib/Test/Simple/t/fail-more..........FAILED at test 2
I have not been able to figure out why fail-like test is failing. I have tried looking at it in the Perl debugger, but nothing is obvious to me.
-John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Opinion Only
