>I can't mail you for some reason (your MX is extremely fragile from my >end), but here will do anyway.
Which address? Try the one in my sig. >I'm going through and adding non-reversible SHA1 password support to >TightVNC and I notice you already use "3" to mean "long authentication" >in ChromiVNC 3.4. >How widely is this used? I don't mind pulling it in so we have >cross-compatibility, but realistically, reversible passwords are not >best practice. I don't know of any client-side implementations - I don't even remember if I fully documented it. It was one of the things I had in progress when I ran out of time to work on it. I think the server-side code is complete and functional. For compatibility with deployed ChromiVNC, you'd best adopt a different number than 3, but otherwise I wouldn't worry about it if your scheme is better. If you think it has enough merit to be further implemented, go ahead! -- -------------------------------------------------------------- from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] website: http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/ geekcode: GCS$/E dpu(!) s:- a21 C+++ UL++ P L+++ E W+ N- o? K? w--- O-- M++$ V? PS PE- Y+ PGP++ t- 5- X- R !tv b++ DI+++ D G e+ h+ r++ y+(*) tagline: The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it. _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
