I think it added about 100k to the size of the server and very little to the size of the viewer. My statement was more for lets not cripple some versions with incompatibility. I really like the pluggin suggestion.
Steve -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wayne Throop Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: eSVNC - A FAST Win32 VNC with FileTransfer and a lot more... : I really think that Realvnc should pick up Tightvnc and the file : transfer, finish it with a unix port, and fix the wallpaper feature. If so, then I certainly hope the unix version can be optionally built without file transfer cruft, since the lightweightness of VNC is one of it's charms. If the minimal size of the normal clients/servers are increased much, it's a Bad Thing. Or put it this way. I 'druther the file transfer stuff be packaged into separate executable images on unix (at the very least). Wayne Throop [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
