First of all the viewer is perfectly capable of accepting ports. I do it all the time, especially when ssh tunneling.
<server ip or address>:80 will connect on port 80. I am a bit curious how how you managed to come up with 2 different numbers for the ports though. I have a webserver running on my test machine, but I set the display to 65617 (port 81) and then in my viewer I did "server:81" and it connected fine. John -----Original Message----- From: Jae P. Lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 01:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PORT 80 Issue I know this issue has been brought up many times in the past but, I am still having problems with VNC working through Port 80. I don't understand why it is not easer to set the port number in VNC. Why don't you guys just program VNC to ask for a port number instead of a display number system that is currently being used? I have to add numbers and subtract numbers. You have a different number on the viewer then on the server. Someone should make this easer! OK enough complaining! I am using the latest version of eSVNC. I have the Display number on the server set to 59716 which translates to 80. And on the Viewer 65616 which translates to 80 as well. I still can't connect through my two firewalls. Can someone tell me if I am doing this right! I feel it is VNC and not my firewalls. I have static numbers on both sides and no NAT or proxy. I have used Remotely Anywhere with no problems using port 80. I just can't get any form of VNC to work through 80. Thanks for the help. Jae Lupo Systems Administrator Ansett Aircraft Spares & Services 12675 Encinitas Avenue Sylmar, CA 91342 [demime 0.99d.1 removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
