Hello,

I'm using tightVNC 1.2.2, accessing solaris8
from WinME.  Our Sun administrator recently
upgraded from Acrobat Reader 4.0 to 5.0.
Reader warns that it doesnt' have
enough colors, starts up in grayscale, and
displays the document a pitch black.

According to Reader's README, Reader's
warning is expected if invoked by netscape
because netscape doesn't "grab" enough
colors for Reader.  I'm not invoking it from
netscape.  Furthermore, the default visual
for TightVNC is 8-bit true-color.

The README is a bit confusing here because
it says the problem occurs when the visual
is 8 planes or less, but then it attributes the
problem to netscape not grabbing enough colors,
and suggests starting acroread first.  That's too
different causes.

The problem does not occur if I start up the VNC
server as pseudocolor.  But it's not very convenient
to startup up a VNC desktop everytime just to use
Reader.  I tried using 9-bits color depth, in case
there was anything to the README story, but that
didn't help either.

Any ideas?  I know that I don't understand the
color alottment scheme of VNC very well.  I did
play around with it for a good long time in the past,
trying to find a good color scheme for the syntax
enabled source code viewing of gvim.  What I found
is that when, say, 2 bits are allotted to one of RGB,
I don't really get 4 levels of that color (which is what
I thought I would get).  I seem to recall that the number
of colors was about half what I would expect, so a bit
is lost for each color somewhere.  This is on a TFT
screen, so there might be issues of linearity and sensitivty
there; I'm not familiar with that technology.

Thanks for any ideas.

Fred

P.S.  Another way to solve the Reader 5.0 problem
is to make it work the way 4.0 did.  Never had a
problem with colors in 4.0.  Is there a way to do this?

--
Fred Ma, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carleton University, Dept. of Electronics
1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario
Canada, K1S 5B6
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

Reply via email to