Hi there! Finally, a real response. OK, pardon my ignorance, but I am not familiar with the issues surrounding preprocessor macros. I do not see exactly what you are asking me to do? Replace the macros with ... what?
I was thinking earlier that if there was a way I could simply reimplement GET_PIXEL8, etc. as FUNCTONS rather than macros... Could you clarify a bit? What exactly would forking off three versions of hextile.c do? On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Ron Goldman wrote: > Try compiling rfbproto.c with the -E switch to view just the output > from the preprocessor. Since GET_PIXEL8, etc. are macros if you see > them in the output file then the problem is that the preprocessor is > not expanding them correctly for some reason. > > A very crude hack in that case is to just make 3 copies of the file > hextile.c (hextile8.c, hextile16.c & hextile32.c) and edit them so that > the call to GET_PIXEL is GET_PIXEL8, 16 or 32. Then edit rfbproto.c so > the 3 includes of hextile.c use the modified files. > > Good luck. > > -- Ron -- > > p.s. personally I use tightvnc and find that the Java applet turned > into a Mac OS X app is plenty fast enough, though it does take a while > to start up. > J e s s i c a L e a h B l a n k _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
