> RealVNC seemed to have an overall faster transfer rate, in that the first > screen just popped right up. However, TightVNC had a faster *feel*, because > the RealVNC client would "freeze" whenever a large amount of data was being > transferred. Whenever a large screen update was being made, the mouse > stopped responding and the client wouldn't perform the local screen update > until it had all of the image data.
Ben, This is a well-known flaw of the old Windows VNCViewer, and is fixed in the upcoming release. Watch this space... :) -- Dr. James "Wez" Weatherall RealVNC Ltd. - http://www.realvnc.com - The Home of VNC _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
