On Friday, September 05, 2003 5:25 PM [GMT-5=EST], jwaterbrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Adam, for some good insight on what you think the problem is. > > I'm having a hard time believing something can't be done about it on > the VNC side though. Fixes, to me, don't mean "don't use it", they > mean "change this and it will work", so I'd like to pursue this a bit > further. I'm with you all the way on this. > While a remote user is in a remote desktop session, the local > computer screen is at the "welcome screen". The resolution hasn't > changed and the user can log in and interrupt the remote desktop > session if he chooses. The local screen is still there, and usable, > so I see no reason VNC should not be. MS will continue to have > support for Remote desktop as a way to phase out VNC and push their > proprietary version. I prefer an open source version, rather than a > microsoft version, maybe we can figure this out if someone has some > insight on the subject. I prefer Open Source as well. In fact, I have many times attempted to replace my Windows environment with many of the available Linux distributions, as well as BeOS, but I always find myself reverting back to Win2K/XP. As far as RD goes, I am convinced that /something/ happens with the display driver during the session, -- exactly what that /something/ is, perhaps no one (besides M$) will ever know. Perhaps everything will all pan out with Windows XP SP2 and with RealVNC 4.0 Gold. -Adam _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
