Accidentally replied to individual instead of the list. Forwarding this to the list for everyone's sake :)
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:50:53 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I suggest that the router at your work blocks incoming packets > over a > certain size. This would allow the small authentication packets > through the > SSL port, but not the large encrypted data packets. > Nope. RDP, WTS, and PCAnywhere connections happen all the time through this router. I actually tried having the SSH server listen on port 5631 (the PCAnywhere port) just in case there was something port-specific like that happening; and I get the same results. I could use port 3389 (the RDP port) except that I need to RDP to my own machine at times..., so I'd have to involve WORK_2, run Putty on THAT, and then vNC from WORK_1 to WORK_2, instead of localhost. Messy, and a lot of effort when there's no good reason to believe that this is happening. Also, from my original message: >> -- I can go to my OTHER friend's house, who is connected via >> DSL and *IS* behind a router (Linksys), and experience >> identical symptoms to those described above. This _should_ >> rule out any work-related issues such as "they're blocking >> traffic", etcetera, because my friend doesn't have the >> capacity to do any of that on his router, and doesn't even >> have any ports forwarded. >> A Linksys router is not capable of doing packet-size blocking of this nature, so it can't be anything "special" added from work; it has to be something else. -- Derek _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
