Daniel, The VNC module for X, and the Xvnc server both hook into the X server directly, and so in effect are already using functionality equivalent (but more efficient than) the "damage" extension.
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Hornung > Sent: 06 October 2004 13:18 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: X11R6.8 / X.org > > Hello everyone, especially the development people! > > Apart from some problems with the patch with the new X > release (X11R6.8 from X.org), are you planning to implement a > version of Xvnc whichmakes use of the new "damage" extension > to X? This might really be an advantage on slower machines > (yes, they still exist), and I (and probably many > others) are looking forward to this! BTW, the next SuSE > release (9.2) will only have the new X installed, the same > holds true for many other distributions. > > Thanks, Daniel Hornung > _______________________________________________ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
