Robin, No, that's the way VNC 3 used to work as well.
Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robin Hill > Sent: 14 March 2005 13:29 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: VNC-List digest, Vol 1 #1270 - 7 msgs > > On Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 12:16:24PM -0000, James Weatherall wrote: > > > Robin et al, > > > > > VNC works with the in-memory display buffer, before it > gets passed to > > > the graphics card for any additional processing. > > > > This is not true. The current VNC Server for Windows > releases grab the > > graphical data back from the graphics card after it has > been rendered. > > Rendering therefore still benefits from any GPU > optimisations in writing to > > the primary display surface. > > > I stand corrected - is this since v4? I'm still running > 3.something on > most of my systems so maybe this'll give me an incentive to upgrade! > > Cheers, > Robin > -- > ___ > ( ' } | Robin Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > / / ) | Little Jim says .... | > // !! | "He fallen in de water !!" | > _______________________________________________ > VNC-List mailing list > [email protected] > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
