Tim,

I'm afraid you are mistaken.

The GPL grants recipients of a piece of software rights to obtain the source
code for it.  It does not remove any of the copyright-holder's rights.

It is not OK include GPL code in proprietary products.  Any work which is a
derived work of code obtained under the GPL must itself be provided only
under the terms of the GPL.

Cheers,

Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Meador
> Sent: 04 April 2005 02:15
> To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Subject: Re: What good is VNC's GPL?

[snip]

> > I also believe that this is OK because the RealVNC team owns the
> > copyright on the GPL code and they are allowed to use it in non-GPL
> > products.  Am I right?
> 
> No.  No one can 'own' or copyright anything that's GPL'd.  It's public
> property.
>  
> > is RealVNC not also allowed to let other > companies buy the right
> > to use GPL'd code to create non-GPL software?
> 
> Anyone can use GPL'd code to create non-GPL sotware.  
> BUT...and I hope I
> get this right...
> 
> 1. If changes are made to the GPL'd code, it MUST be re-released back
> into the pulic domain.  It cannot be copyrighted, etc.
> 2. Additions (as separate add-ons, not added-in changes to the GPL'd
> code itself) do not have to be GPL'd, and can be copyrighted as
> proprietry software.
> 
> IOW, it's OK to include GPL code in proprietary products, but what
> you're actually being charged for is the non-GPL part of the product,
> because any modified GPL code has to be released to the public.
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

Reply via email to