Hello, The RFB proto specification isn't too clear on this issue:
1) I ask (and receive) a full framebuffer update (initial screen) 2) then I continue to ask for framebuffer updates for a region of the remote desktop, but keeping the first full update in memory 3) I start asking for updates on a different region of the remote framebuffer (non-overlapping with the first region) At the above situation, is the correct way to: 1) Use the incremental flag for the request for updates of the new region, since I do have its original state still in memory (ie. does the server know to send optimized updates considering I didn't express explicit interest in the new region before except for the initial screen) 2) Ask for a non-incremental update on the new region and continue as usual? Of course the latter option should work always, but the former option would definately save some bandwidth. -- Taneli Leppd | Sektori.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://sektori.com/> _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
