I tried UltraVNC to control a complex remote application and found it
unacceptable. Many times, pull-down menus on the desktop screen were not
displayed on the remote laptop, nor were some error message windows. The
result was hang situations that couldn't be resolved without manual
intervention at the controlled PC. This was with the UltraVNC version I
downloaded just 2 days ago. I then went to Real VNC, personal version, and
found it to be flawless in controlling the application. I didn't need all
the bells and whistles that come with the other VNC varieties - just good
dependable performance.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gareth Davies, Aberdeen Internet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:08 AM
Subject: TightVNC v Ultra VNC - Which is best?
Have been trying TightVNC but having had a quick look at UltraVNC it looks
appealing. Looks like a bit nicer interface and some other advantages such
as chat, and rescaling viewer to fit window. And did I read somewhere that
it's normally faster? (I just need for between Windows PCs).
Can anyone advise what are the other pros and cons between the two
programs
and which is best choice overall.
Many thanks.
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[email protected]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[email protected]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
