Ok now sitting at home......

using: http://www.gotomyvnc.com/ on pc1 and pc2 results in:

Checking you out at IP address "81.191.xxx.yyy"...

81.191.xxx.yyy is accepting connections on Display 0 (TCP port 5900).

81.191.xxx.yyy is not responding on Display 1. (is there a problem here?)

81.191.xxx.yyy is not responding on Display 2.

81.191.xxx.yyy is not responding on Display 3.

81.191.xxx.yyy is not responding on Display 4.

81.191.xxx.yyy is not responding on Display 5.

81.191.xxx.yyy is not responding on Display 6.

81.191.xxx.yyy is not responding on Display 7.

81.191.xxx.yyy is not responding on Display 8.

81.191.xxx.yyy is not responding on Display 9.

Scan of "81.191.xxx.yyy" is complete.

Hit 'reload' or 'refresh' in your browser to scan again.

Also testing this http://www.realvnc.com/cgi-bin/nettest.cgi at pc1
and pc2 results this:

The IP address requesting this web page is 81.191.183.194

Connecting to port 5900 ... succeeded.

Waiting for server to send version string...

Found a VNC Enterprise Edition or Personal Edition server.

What is my problem?

When I connect from pc1 (which is configured as 5900/5900) to pc2
(which is configured in the router as 5900/5901) unable to connect to
.... connection refused...

By the way, I have checked ZoneAlarm, seems ok. And I know use the
same dns on both pc's (xxx.redirectme.net)

I'm in the blind here....please :)





On 11/10/05, Simen Lxland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No probs :)
>
> On 11/10/05, John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Glad to help... btw, apologies for mis-spelling your first name, Simen.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simen Lxland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:54 AM
> > To: John Aldrich
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: RealVNC questions about ports and display number
> >
> >
> > OKI, got it!
> >
> > Thanx a lot :)
> >
> > On 11/10/05, John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Simon:
> > > You configure the display number in the viewer. You connect on port 5901
> > to
> > > the *router* which forwards it to port 5900 on *PC2*.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Simen Lxland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:45 AM
> > > To: John Aldrich
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: RealVNC questions about ports and display number
> > >
> > >
> > > But what about:
> > >
> > > Is there no need to configure display number in VNC? How can VNC
> > > differ from the different ports when I connect using the vnc-viewer?
> > >
> > > On 11/10/05, John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Ahh.. yes. ZA would be an issue. You should add winvnc4.exe as an
> > > exception
> > > > to *always* be granted.
> > > > As for the public/private ports, yes. 5901 "public" and 5900 "private"
> > for
> > > > pc2 would work just fine. The reason you can't have port 5900 for both
> > is
> > > > that you have the same external IP for both machines (unless you've got
> > > some
> > > > sort of subnet we dont' know about, and then you could have two
> > different
> > > IP
> > > > addresses... but 99% of the people here trying to access "home" from
> > > "work"
> > > > dont' have that setup! <Grin>) and your router would likely not be able
> > to
> > > > figure out where to send the network traffic if you tried to configure
> > > both
> > > > machines to use 5900 externally/publicly.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Simen Lxland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:35 AM
> > > > To: John Aldrich
> > > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Re: RealVNC questions about ports and display number
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > One thing i can think of is a Zone Alarm pop-up on my pc2 at home
> > > > which needs to be granted access before i can get through from work. I
> > > > will check later today.
> > > >
> > > > Is there no need to configure display number in VNC? How can VNC
> > > > differ from the different ports?
> > > >
> > > > Can you answer this?
> > > > In my Dlink routher DI624+ i beleive the public port is the 5901 port
> > > > and the private port is the 5900 when forwarding on pc2. On my other pc
> > I
> > > > have 5900 on both public and private.
> > > >
> > > > On 11/10/05, John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Simon:
> > > > > I'd say you should put redirectme.net:1 in the viewer at work. All
> > > things
> > > > > considered, though, it *should* have worked all along. Don't know why
> > it
> > > > > didn't work, though. You can also try it as :xxx.redirectme.net::5901
> > > and
> > > > > see if that makes any difference. (Note the double ":")
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Simen Lxland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:28 AM
> > > > > To: John Aldrich
> > > > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: Re: RealVNC questions about ports and display number
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, thanx! Ill try!
> > > > >
> > > > > But where do i specfi the port :1 (redirectme.net:1)? In the viewer of
> > > > > the machine i use at work or at the server for pc2 (since pc1 works
> > > > > fine already).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/10/05, John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > I'll be honest with you... I've never had to use the web client.
> > That
> > > > > being
> > > > > > said, if you're going to use the browser to view your desktops, you
> > > > should
> > > > > > probably open the 580x ports as well, forwarding them to the
> > > appropriate
> > > > > > system, unless you're using the paid-for version of RealVNC which
> > > allows
> > > > > you
> > > > > > to use a single port for both Java and VNC client.
> > > > > > Also, you shouldn't need two separate machine names on no-ip -- just
> > > > > > different display numbers on the same "machine name" as long as they
> > > > share
> > > > > > an internet connection. If you check, I think you'll find that
> > > > > > xxx.redirectme.net and xxx1.redirectme.net are the same IP address.
> > > So,
> > > > > you
> > > > > > should ONLY have to use xxx.redirectme.net and xxx.redirectme.net:1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Simen Lxland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:20 AM
> > > > > > To: John Aldrich
> > > > > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > > > > Subject: Re: RealVNC questions about ports and display number
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do I have to do anything about the display number?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or should it be enough using vncviewer as this to connect to either:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://xxx.redirectme.net -> pc1
> > > > > > http://xxx1.redirectme.net ->
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In my Dlink routher DI624+ i beleive the public port is the 5901
> > port
> > > > > > and the private port is the 5900 when forwarding. On my other pc I
> > > > > > have 5900 on both public and private.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 11/10/05, John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Well, what *seems* to be the recommended action is to forward port
> > > > 5900
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > PC1's port 5900, forward port 5901 to PC2's Port 5900, and so on.
> > > That
> > > > > way
> > > > > > > you get a unique port on the router for each PC, but you don't
> > have
> > > to
> > > > > > > change the default ports on the individual PCs. You *can* do a
> > > > > > > straight-through port-to-port mapping, but that seems more work
> > than
> > > > is
> > > > > > > strictly necessary to me. :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Behalf Of Simen Lxland
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 8:42 AM
> > > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > > Subject: Fwd: RealVNC questions about ports and display number
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > One more question!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do I have to change the connection port on each server? Today on
> > pc1
> > > i
> > > > > > > use port 5900 and on pc2 i use 5901 or should the ports be the
> > same?
> > > > > > > Should I change the display number on each server?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Should my port forwarding on my router be TCP 5900 only or TCP
> > 5900
> > > > > > > and TCP 5901?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > > > > From: Simen Lxland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > Date: 11-Oct-2005 11:54
> > > > > > > Subject: RealVNC questions about ports and display number
> > > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have two pc's on my LAN and are trying to connect to them from
> > > work.
> > > > > > > I have set up both with static DCHP-adresses, I have mapped the
> > port
> > > > > > > forwarding (5900 for pc1 and 5901 for pc two) in my router (Dlink
> > > > > > > DI-624+) and made sure the firewall in the router is accepting
> > these
> > > > > > > ports. I use ZoneAlarm on both pc's. I have set up VNC-server as a
> > > > > > > service on both pc's. I use No-ip client on both,
> > > > > > > http://xxx.redirectme.net on pc1 and http://xxx1.redirectme.net on
> > > > > > > pc2.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I manage to connect to pc one with the vnc-viewer at my work. But
> > > when
> > > > > > > I try to connect to pc two i get timeout.....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I try this url to connect to: http://xxx1.redirectme.net:5091 and
> > > > > > > http://xxx1.redirectme.net:1 - is this right or wrong?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What do i have to do to get this to work- seems a bit strange to
> > me
> > > > > > > why i can connect to pc1 but not to pc2......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Qtip
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > VNC-List mailing list
> > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > To remove yourself from the list visit:
> > > > > > > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[email protected]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

Reply via email to