Sorry to hear...

If I may ask, is an OS upgrade possible?  If not, depending on what you
are needing and the version of VNC you are using, you could enable
sharing of display :0 using the vnc.so library loaded via the
XF86Config.  What you get with the sharing of display :0 is effectively
showing the physical console remotely via VNC and it doesn't go through
inetd, but that version of RedHat+VNC may require the xf4vnc package
(http://xf4vnc.sourceforge.net/) .   I have not used that package
directly.  On the Linux distros where I have exported display :0, the
proper package + libraries were already installed in my setup.  

Regards.

>>> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at  6:25 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bovy,
Stephen J"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> Hi Jeff
> 
> Well I think you are correct (:
> 
> I did a search on redhat 6.2 and inetd and found several bug reprots
> 
> unfortunately these are old outdated redhat bug reports and the ftp
> links to the fix packages 
> no longer exist 
> 
> and I have not been able to find a redhat archival ftp mirror with
the
> old update repository (sigh)
> 
> Now another slightly different question
> 
> which vnc implementation is faster ?? I do not want to start any
flame
> wars (:   
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 3:47 PM
> To: Bovy, Stephen J
> Cc: vnc- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: inetd and port 59(xx) gives me empty
testpatterngreyscreen
> ???
> 
> <Replying to all> ;- )
> 
> I don't recall right off what the "unix" means in the font path, but
is
> the URI format required to connect to a broadcasting font server. 
I'll
> look for the info later.
> 
> As far as /etc/services, I thought that /etc/services was mandatory
for
> using Xvnc in inetd mode because they work together.  /etc/services
> defines a service name and tells the inetd superserver which port to
> listen on and which network protocols it uses.  Then when a request
> comes in that matches, inetd uses the info from /etc/inetd.conf to
know
> how to launch the process for that service.
> 
> Theoretically, wait mode is for persistent sessions, but I've never
used
> it.  I have always used nowait mode or configured the sharing of
> display:0.
> 
> As I type this, I am vaguely recalling an issue with inetd not
working
> correctly on a certain Linux distro...maybe this is that case...hmm. 
I
> need to research that one.
> 
>>>> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at  4:09 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bovy,
Stephen
> J"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
>> Thanks  Jeff,
>> 
>> Yup, basically been there done almost all of that stuf
>> 
>> I was running as root that did not help
>> 
>> Yes I know XDMCP is working  I connect in using several different
x-
> win
>> managers such as cygwin x-  win
>> 
>> yes I have the font server up and running
>> 
>> xdeep32 is another free x-  win manager works great (:
>> 
>> the only thing I have not tried yet is using etc/services...
>> 
>> I was trying "nowait" to establish a persistent session
>> 
>> "wait" works great as long as I use port ( 5900 )
>> 
>> hmm I guess I could try adding -  fp unix/:7100  what does the
unix/
> mean
>> ???
>> 
>> Hey Jeff please try reply-  all so that you include the mail-  list
in
> our
>> thread discussion
>> 
>> this mail list is kind-  of weird  most mail lists do not include
the 
>> subscribers email it is kind of confusing
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Stephen Bovy
>> Computer Associates
>> 6100 Center Drive
>> Suite 700
>> Los Angeles, CA 90045
>> Tel: (310) 957-  3930
>> Fax: (310) 957-  3917
>> Mobile: (818) 352-  9917
>> e-  mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> -----  Original Message-----
>> From: Jeff Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 2:40 PM
>> To: Bovy, Stephen J
>> Subject: RE: inetd and port 59(xx) gives me empty test
> patterngreyscreen
>> ???
>> 
>> Boy, it's been a while for me for those older versions.  Here is a
> brain
>> dump...it may not all apply to RH 6.2 or your situation, but
> something
>> may help (shotgun approach ;-  ).  This is all based on past usage
of
> VNC
>> 3.2.x versions.
>> 
>> Here is a couple of lines from the /etc/services and /etc/inetd.conf

>> files I normally include when I do similar things.
>> 
>> #/etc/services
>> vnc-  1280x1024x24        5973/tcp
>> 
>> #/etc/inetd.conf
>> vnc-  1024x768x24 stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/bin/Xvnc Xvnc -
> inetd
>> -  query localhost -  once -  geometry 1024x768 -  depth 24
>> 
>> In this configuration, connect using the VNC service 192.168.0.22:73

>> (substitute your IP).
>> 
>> I wasn't worried about security in our labs where I use this a lot
so
> I
>> use "root" as the user to run the Xvnc binary.  There can be rights

>> issues for Xvnc and the 'nobody' or 'james' users.  Some operating 
>> systems don't allow users with a UID > 1024 to access/run certain 
>> things.  You might try adding root just to eliminate that issue
>> 
>> Also, I have known issues when the X Font server wasn't running
> (xfs),
>> but don't recall if that is an issue on RH 6.2.  Once you get xvf to

>> start when booted, then you can add:  -  fp unix/:7100 (or whatever
> port
>> yours is using).
>> 
>> If you are running in inetd mode, you shouldn't need to require the
>> '-  passwordfile' option as the inetd method gives you at a new
> session
>> with a GUI login prompt.  There may be reasons to require a
password
> to
>> even attach via VNC, I just haven't seen it done.
>> 
>> As far as XDMCP being enabled...I've never used xdeep32 so I don't
> know
>> how it works.  But as a sanity check, I'd still verify the display 
>> manager settings.  In that version of RH, if it is running gdm I
> think
>> it uses the xdm configuration files in /etc/X11/xdm.  If there is a
> file
>> called xdm-  config, comment out the last line
>> 
>> ! DisplayManager.requestPort: 0
>> 
>> and then in Xaccess, uncomment the line:
>> 
>> *               #any host can get a login window
>> 
>> Newer versions of gdm use a gdm.conf file.  If you are using kdm,
> there
>> might be a file called kdmrc that you can look at.  I check the
> display
>> manager I am running by doing 'ps -  ef | grep dm' and see what it
> finds.
>> 
>> Let us know how it goes.
>> 
>> -  Jeff
>> 
>>>>> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at  2:22 PM, in message
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bovy,
> Stephen
>> J"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
>>> Thanks for responding
>>> 
>>> I am using redhat 6.2 (yes I know it is old) (:
>>> 
>>> IN this case I think the default is gdm
>>> 
>>> But XDMCP is enabled and working
>>> 
>>> I am using win32  xdeep32.exe x-   win  manager to connect to
xdmcp
>> desk
>>> top no problem
>>> 
>>> And if you re-   read my email
>>> 
>>> inetd with port  (5900) works perfectly with -   query xxx -  
once
>>> 
>>> the only time things get "buggy" is when I try to use {  59(xx)  }
> as
>> a
>>> port address (: 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Stephen Bovy
>>> Computer Associates
>>> 6100 Center Drive
>>> Suite 700
>>> Los Angeles, CA 90045
>>> Tel: (310) 957-   3930
>>> Fax: (310) 957-   3917
>>> Mobile: (818) 352-   9917
>>> e-   mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> -----   Original Message-----
>>> From: Jeff Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 1:04 PM
>>> To: Bovy, Stephen J
>>> Subject: Re: inetd and port 59(xx) gives me empty test pattern 
>>> greyscreen ???
>>> 
>>> Usually means XDMCP is not enabled.  What Linux distro you running
>> and
>>> which display manager (gdm, kdm, etc.) ?
>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at  1:28 PM, in message
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bovy,
>> Stephen
>>> J"
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
>>>> 5950 stream tcp nowait nobody /usr/local/bin/Xvnc Xvnc -    inetd
-
>>> query
>>>> localhost -    once securitytypes=none
>>>> 
>>>> Gray Screen on first connection, xdm on subsequent connections
>>>> 
>>>> 5951 stream tcp wait james /usr/local/bin/Xvnc Xvnc -    inetd -
>> query
>>>> localhost -    once passwordFile=/home/james/.vnc/passwd
>>>> 
>>>> Gray screen all the time
>>>> 
>>>> The only thing that works consistenly is:
>>>> 
>>>> 5900 stream tcp nowait nobody /usr/local/bin/Xvnc Xvnc -    inetd
-
>>> query
>>>> localhost -    once securitytypes=none
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> VNC-    List mailing list
>>>> VNC-    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> To remove yourself from the list visit:
>>>> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-    list
>> _______________________________________________
>> VNC-  List mailing list
>> VNC-  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To remove yourself from the list visit:
>> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-  list
> _______________________________________________
> VNC- List mailing list
> VNC- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To remove yourself from the list visit:
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc- list
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[email protected]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

Reply via email to