Curt I am using the java client as a standalone now, so to be honest I suppose there's no reason to use a native mac binary. Storing passwords would be the only handy feature that the java client lacks. The performance is fine.
I believe the Adderlink IP is developed by RealVNC - it's linked on the website. I have no idea what they've done to the spec but it won't work properly with any non-RealVNC client that I've tried. It is fast though - using the java client, it seems more responsive than any other VNC server I've used. M. On 6/2/06, Curt Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Matt, > > "I'd rather use a standalone application" > Why? > > The Java client can be used as a standalone application. I'm not > enough of of Mac user to give you detailed instructions quickly, but I > bet someone on this list is. > > I've been looking at making some improvements to the Java client. > More specifically: > - adding full screen support > - performance optimizations > - possible other stuff, depending on your answer to "Why?" above > > However, this is a spare-time project, so don't count on it soon. Is > there a library of canned VNC sessions anywhere that I could use for > profiling? > > - Curt > > PS -- I don't have an Adderlink IP box. It sounds like Adderlink > isn't implementing the spec properly. Does anyone have a library of > saved Adderlink sessions for testing with? Connecting to Windows XP > running the latest RealVNC, Chicken of the VNC worked fine for me. _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
