Hi, I've been a light user of VNC for many years. I've noticed that there are many variables that determine the quality of user experience. The most obvious of these was how much faster *nix servers were than Windows.
Recently, I discovered that Windows XP makes a more responsive VNC server than Windows 2000. Can anyone explain why this is? Nothing is CPU bound, so perhaps Windows XP has better hooks for the display or a better TCP/IP stack. Also, the Java client seems slower despite not being CPU bound. Does it support the same protocols? Thanks, Curt _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
