vishal jogi wrote: > Hi all, > How we can measure performance of RealVNC client with other RFB Client? > What performance wil you measure? There are a lot of possible bottlenecks:
- If it is a virtual display as default on unix, then there is the performance of Xvnc, the X11 server. - If it is a copy of a physical display, then how is the information grabbed? With unix/linux, it can be hooked into the X11 server on the physical display, or it can be hooked into the display manager process. For all msWindows (and sometimes for unix too) it is a polling meganism that scans for changes. Then there is the network usage. The bandwith of the network can be an issue, however, for the responsiveness, the network delay (the ping-time) can be a source of slow response too. Finally what is the local display: the process of the local viewer (binary or java) and the used local hardware/os/software. > Which tool can be used for that? > There is a tool for every bottleneck. In the end, it is the experience at the desktop that counts. > How RealVNC is better then other clients? > Less features indicates less code to share the resources. In the end, I'd say the features of vnc let me guide which variant to use, not the performance. If performance is an issue, I donnot think vnc is the first one to blame, most times it is due to lack of resources on or between the local and remote systems: busy remote system, low network troughput or even busy local system. CBee _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
