Hi,
  Below is an old message sent to this list, for which I could find
replies.
  I have recently encountered the same problem, but have additional info
that
may give someone more knowledgeable some clues as to the cause - and a
possible
solution.
...................................cut
here..................................
List:     [3]vnc-list
Subject:  address garbled in linux
From:     [4]Guy McArthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:     [5]1999-11-16 18:08:29
[[6]Download message RAW]

Hello, I have RH 6.0 (glibc 2.1.1). When I try to run vncviewer I get an
output like
"Couldn't convert 'h&@h&@9.22' to host address" where it is garbling the
first few bytes of the server address. I can telnet to the address on
port
5900 and verify that the server is running.

This happens with the linux binaries AND the executables compiled from
the
unix source distribution.

Is there a problem I can fix on my end?
--
Guy "Smiley" McArthur  [home] 520.326.4555 [web] [7]www.seds.org/~smiley
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]       [work] 520.881.8101 [icq] 17470307


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The VNC mailing list - see
[8]http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
.......................................cut
here...............................

  I also am running RedHat 6.0 and am using VNC 3.3.3 R1-3 and KDE as the
Desktop manager. I have a small home LAN with no outside connections.
   What happens is: While in KDE as ROOT, if you start vncviewer from the
Desktop executable prompt, ie., right-click background, the "widget"
which
prompts for input for the Server address appears, as it should. If you
enter
a valid ip number w/ display #, the "widget" just disappears. If, on the
other hand, you open an x-term and enter 'vncviewer' the "widget"
appears,
but when the Host address is entered, you get a message 'couldn't convert
<ipaddress(garbled)> to host address.'
   What makes this interesting is that it only happens as ROOT, and only
in KDE. The other Desktop Managers I've tried, AfterStep, AnotherLevel,
etc.
seem not to have this problem. AND, if I log on as USER, in KDE,
everything
works as it should.
   As ROOT in KDE, if I open a x-term and type 'vncviewer' with ANY of
its
options ( -depth, -share, etc.) the "widget" works correctly. If I type
'vncviewer <ipaddress:display#>' it also works correctly.
   If, as ROOT, I bring up the "widget" from the Desktop executable, as
above,
but maximize it, or just grab in on the corner and make it bigger, it
also
works correctly. Making it smaller, or just moving it does nothing.
   This odd behavior manifests itself on both my Linux machines; both
with
RedHat 6.0 and KDE. Vncviewer misbehaves identically when I am ROOT on
the other
machine also.
   Vncviewer worked correctly when first installed, but shortly developed
this
strange behavior. I have re-installed it a number of times, but to no
avail..
   The simple "workaround" is to make a Desktop icon which executes
vncviewer with
the <depth> option - set to the value I happen to use anyway.
   If anyone can offer some insights as to a "proper" solution, I would
be glad
to attempt a fix.
   Please e-mail any suggestions directly to me at:

                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   (My connection to the internet is via a "buggy" local library dial-up.

Getting at the mailing list is not always easy. But, like Linux and VNC,
its 
free and doesn't require a ton of ram to use.)

                               Thanks in advance.........  Tom


________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to