On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, James ''Wez'' Weatherall wrote:
> WinVNC should operate pretty well for normal apps, including the desktop,
> under Win9x, WinNT and Win2K, without tweaking the settings.
>
> Have you rebooted the machine since you installed?
Yes, several times, and tried many different options, and a different
graphics card...
I just tried WinVNC on a 500 MHz Windows 98 machine, and it works fine
with the default settings (and much faster)!
So why does it fail on my 200 MHz Windows 95 machine? Is it because the
machine is too slow, or WinVNC doesn't work so well with Windows 95? Is
there anything I can do to diagnose the problem?
--
Mario Becroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://gem.win.co.nz/mb/
68HC08 support site - http://www.hc08.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
