Freddy Jensen wrote:
> I have been following some of the email exchange
> reg. TightVNC, and I am curious about whether it
> will eventually be incorporated into the main
> codebase that is maintained at att?
Me too! Seems to me that what with Tridia/Tight/AT&T versions
all forking off in different directions (somebody correct me
if I'm wrong & there's plans to merge diffs or patches) that
there's an overall loss to the user community as a whole. One
of the problems (I guess) is that what would traditionally be
compile-time options (under *ix) don't really work so well
when so many of the platforms VNC is available for aren't
platforms where people are used to compiling stuff <cough>
doze<cough> and so the project forks rather than grows. Pity.
Is it possible to pull it all together again?
--
Illtud Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uwch Ddadansoddwr Systemau Senior Systems Analyst
Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru National Library of Wales
Yn siarad drosof fy hun, nid LlGC - Speaking personally, not for NLW
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
