Send VoiceOps mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of VoiceOps digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: VoiceOps Digest, Vol 52, Issue 8 ([email protected])
2. Re: New SPA2100/2102/1001 exploit in the wild? (Shripal Daphtary)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:01:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] VoiceOps Digest, Vol 52, Issue 8
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20131019/8ebbcf2f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:30:53 -0700
From: Shripal Daphtary <[email protected]>
To: Tim Bray <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New SPA2100/2102/1001 exploit in the wild?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cisco used the cube as an Enterprise SBC when deploying the call manager. Now
they came out with this product called the nano cube for service providers like
bsft service providers. It's like competition to the edge water product line I
would imagine.
Anyway, they say that they will use this device to have local survivability and
monitoring resources and also as a proxy.
They also stated that they would announce the Cisco 8900s support on the
bworks. I have my doubts on that though because all indications otherwise seem
to contradict that.
Just relaying what they said to me.
Shripal
> On Oct 19, 2013, at 4:42 AM, Tim Bray <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 19/10/13 02:10, Shripal Daphtary wrote:
>> On that note. I just met with Cisco at the bsft connections show. And
>> they told me they were "recommitting" to the service provider market
>> with an esbc nano cube and handsets certicification on the bworks in
>> 3 weeks.
>
>
> What do you mean by `esbc nano cube` ?
>
> It would be a shame if the SPA engineers have been terminated. Very
> competent product which has been in the market relatively unchanged for
> many years. Favoured by service providers for its secure provisioning
> and robust SIP operations. They don't break or do weird stuff too often.
>
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
------------------------------
End of VoiceOps Digest, Vol 52, Issue 9
***************************************
