Hi Shaun

I have evaluated a solution that is good enough flexible for us, it is based 
100% on SIP so it generates alerts pretty fast, almost online, and it has 
proved to catch irregular traffic which resulted in fraud calls so that we can 
block immediately; this way this system is better than the CDR based in house 
developed system we do use to detect irregular traffic. Such new solution is 
called Redshift from Redshift Networks by the way.

Regards 

Santiago
________________________________________
De: VoiceOps [voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] En nombre de Shaun Gill 
[shaun.g...@is.co.za]
Enviado el: lunes, 02 de febrero de 2015 01:01 a.m.
Para: Glen Gerhard; voiceops@voiceops.org
Asunto: Re: [VoiceOps] Fraud Management

Thank you for the info Glen.

We have done a POC on OCFM  (Oracle Communications Fraud Monitor; the old FDAP 
- Fraud Detection and Prevention) that relies on OCOM (Oracle Communications 
Operations Monitor; old Acme Palladion product) to feed into the OCFM server. 
We could not get the call correlation on OCOM to work properly without 
extensive changes to our existing infrastructure. The call correlation issues 
resulted in bad data fed into the fraud monitor and resulted in false positives.

Will have a look at the options below.

Regards,
Shaun

From: Glen Gerhard <ggerh...@sansay.com<mailto:ggerh...@sansay.com>>
Date: Friday 30 January 2015 3:40 PM
To: "voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>" 
<voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Fraud Management

Hi Shaun,

most systems work off CDR files (or Radius or Diameter steams) so are 
proprietary in what products they support (http://oculeus.com is one such 
system).  There are some products that are auto-learning based on SIP 
monitoring so are device independent.  http://tollshield.com is one of them and 
builds a network profile over several week to understand "normal" traffic 
patterns.  It can alert on variations of those patterns.  These systems 
requires monitoring ports whereas the CDR approach does not need SPAN ports.

Also there is a difference between systems that can alert on fraud on ones that 
can proactively shut off service to suspect devices.  The proactive ones are 
usually device specific and more expensive and raise the risk of false 
positives.

Regards,

~Glen

On 1/29/2015 11:19 PM, Shaun Gill wrote:
Hi Brad,

Neither - We are not using a product at this stage; using a combination of 
routing profiles (BSFT) and originating source IPs to block suspect traffic.

Regards,
Shaun

From: Brad Anouar <brad.ano...@masergy.com<mailto:brad.ano...@masergy.com>>
Date: Friday 30 January 2015 3:07 AM
To: Shaun Gill <shaun.g...@is.co.za<mailto:shaun.g...@is.co.za>>
Cc: Jay Cox <j...@appiaservices.com<mailto:j...@appiaservices.com>>, 
"voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>" 
<voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Fraud Management

Shaun,

Have you used the SIP or CDR based product?

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Shaun Gill 
<shaun.g...@is.co.za<mailto:shaun.g...@is.co.za>> wrote:
Noted – I will be checking this out Jay.

From: Jay Cox <j...@appiaservices.com<mailto:j...@appiaservices.com>>
Date: Wednesday 28 January 2015 3:44 PM
To: Shaun Gill <shaun.g...@is.co.za<mailto:shaun.g...@is.co.za>>, 
"voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>" 
<voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>>
Subject: RE: [VoiceOps] Fraud Management

Shaun:

I have used the TransNexus solution for a long time.

Jay Cox
Mobile  314 910 7242

From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Shaun Gill
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 2:37 AM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>
Subject: [VoiceOps] Fraud Management

Hi Guys,

Trying to get a feel for what fraud systems are out there for VoIP service 
providers; primarily using terrestrial mediums (such as metroE; diginet) with 
clients interconnecting via IP PBXs, voice gateways and IP phones.
We have had fraud to international premium destinations which we are 
restricting based on calling profiles and originating source IPs; but neither 
is truly scalable.
Subsequently we are looking for alternatives.

Regards,
Shaun



_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops




--

Brad Anouar
Director of Systems Engineering
Email brad.ano...@masergy.com<mailto:brad.ano...@masergy.com>
Office +1 310 360 2028

[http://www.masergy.com/sites/default/files/Hdr_Masegy_Logo.jpg]
www.m<http://www.masergy.com/>asergy.com<http://www.masergy.com/>



_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops



AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este correo electrónico y sus archivos anexos, si 
los tiene, están destinados sólo para la persona o entidad a la que va dirigida 
y contiene información confidencial. Se prohíbe cualquier uso, impresión, 
divulgación o distribución de dicha información sin la autorización por escrito 
del remitente. Si usted no es el destinatario, por favor póngase en contacto 
con el remitente y destruya todas las copias del mensaje original.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and its attachments, if any, are 
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains 
privileged information. Any use, printing, disclosure, or distribution of such 
information without the written authorization of the sender is prohibited. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all 
copies of the original message.

Nuestro aviso de privacidad está publicado en la página Web: 
http://www.mcmtelecom.com.mx/common/politica_privacidad.htm




_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Reply via email to