If this was true, why does ISUP 1 map to 404 by standard?
On Oct 21, 2015 2:13 PM, Brooks Bridges <bbrid...@o1.com> wrote: > > "6xx codes are supposed to be used to indicate definitive knowledge that a > number can't be reached by any other means globally." > > Yet vendors build hardware that still route advances on a 6XX... (yes, I'm > looking at you, Sonus) *grumble* > > Brooks Bridges | Sr. Voice Services Engineer > O1 Communications > 5190 Golden Foothill Pkwy > El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 > office: 916.235.2097 | main: 888.444.1111, Option 2 > email: bbrid...@o1.com | web: www.o1.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex > Balashov > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:04 AM > To: Peter E > Cc: VoiceOps > Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Disconnected numbers and SIP > > I see 404 fairly commonly used to indicate "I don't have a route for this". > 6xx codes are supposed to be used to indicate definitive knowledge that a > number can't be reached by any other means globally. > > -- > Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC > 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 > Atlanta, GA 30346 > United States > > Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ > > Sent from my BlackBerry. > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
