They did in the past, I can't imagine why they'd stop. I haven't tried it in years though.
I've noticed some exceptional call quality from our network to Verizon Wireless lately, but never bothered to try to figure out why. It's enough of a difference that customers have noticed and said something about it. On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Reinventing Rich <[email protected] > wrote: > Im pretty sure level 3 is taking G729 as well, can anyone confirm? > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Nick Olsen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> My apologies, Apparently I'm a bit green on the process. >> >> From what I recall from past conversations on this list, A few carriers >> (Inteliquent being the one that stands out in my memory) would negotiate >> G722 if it worked for all parties. I think I even recall a number (Not a >> URI) being provided at that time with someone saying "This number will >> accept G722 on the Inteliquent network". >> >> I'm not actually the one doing any interconnecting here. I'm purchasing >> wholesale SIP. But I'm told, If I send a call in G722, They'll send out >> whatever I send. So, for S&G's, I was hoping to find someone else perhaps >> on any particular network known to support 722 that had a number to make a >> few test calls with. Since my carrier has interconnects with many networks, >> It's possible it would work to many of those networks? >> >> I've used the zipdx demo (Thanks mgraves). But I know my switch supports >> 722, And that I can make direct IP calls to zipdx in 722. >> >> Thanks for the info! >> >> *Nick Olsen* >> Sr. Network Engineer >> Florida High Speed Internet >> (321) 205-1100 x106 <(321)%20205-1100> >> <http://twitter.com/flhsi> >> >> <https://twitter.com/flhsi> <https://facebook.com/flhighspeed> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From*: [email protected] >> *Sent*: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 3:38 PM >> *To*: [email protected] >> *Cc*: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> *Subject*: Re: [VoiceOps] HD / G722 >> >> In the US, you'll only get G.722 over which non-TDM PSTN networks. >> >> So this question might be asked, "Is there a number that answers G.722 on >> Level(3)'s network?" or, "On Bandwidth's network?". For Level(3), there >> used to be many, but at last testing, Level(3) had clamped down their codec >> list to G.711 only. I'd be glad if someone has newer news. >> >> This is just a hunch though: If you peer with the wireless carriers, >> directly to their SBCs with interconnection agreements with appropriate >> minimums, and it's to their advantage to peer to provide HD Voice, you can >> expect to exchange AMR-WB traffic to their VoLTE customers. >> >> *Mark R Lindsey, SMTS * >> *+1-229-316-0013 <(229)%20316-0013>* >> *[email protected] <[email protected]> / http://ecg.co/ <http://ecg.co/>* >> *Blog: http://200ok.info/ <http://200ok.info/> * >> >> >> >> On Mar 15, 2017, at 15:30 , Nick Olsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Anyone have a test number that will answer in G722? Looking to do some HD >> testing. >> >> Furthermore, Anyone have any success sending an HD call to any of the >> wireless guys? VZW/ATT/TMO all seem to support AMR-WB (G722.2) at least on >> the UE to IMS side. Surely they won't transcode for me 722>722.2? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> VoiceOps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Rich Breton > > Give a man a program, you will frustrate him for a day;Teach him how to > program, you will frustrate him for a lifetime. > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > >
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
