Oh, yeah. Forgot about that. Yes, I think this would be an excellent candidate for ThinQ.
-- Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors. -----Original Message----- From: Ryan Delgrosso <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 11:52 AM Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Current state of the LCR art At your volumes you would not be well served to operate your own. The care and feeding is relatively expensive and time consuming. Have a strong look at Thinq as a managed LCR vendor. I am using them on a few projects and am quite happy. On 9/6/2018 7:02 AM, Dave Sill wrote: > All, > > I’m interested in learning about current best practices regarding LCR > in the CLEC context (~2M minutes / month of LD traffic). What > software/vendors are you using (or avoiding)? What are the > non-obvious pros and cons? How automated is your system / how much > labor do you put in? What percentage are you saving over one provider > with a good rate deck when all costs are considered? Any insights are > appreciated. > > I’m cross-posting this on the FISPA CLEC list, so I apologize if I hit > you twice. > > Thanks, > > Dave Sill > Manager of Business Intelligence and Automation > Socket Telecom > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
