Does this provider have anything to say about the SIP privacy headers, 
P-Asserted-Identity and/or Remote-Party-ID?  Those are typically preferred for 
routing/billing purposes whereas From is typically preferred for display.

You might be able to keep the original caller in the From header, and set the 
P-Asserted-Identity or RPID to the original destination and have the call be 
routed and billed based on that.



From: VoiceOps <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Peter Crawford
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 4:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [VoiceOps] Question about billing on SIP trunks

Hello voice-ops:

Enterprise admin here.

We just converted from ISDN to SIP (and changed providers) and we're seeing 
some undesirable billing behavior.  I'm hoping I can get some objective 
feedback from different providers.

If a call comes into our system, and we forward it off-net using the SIP trunks 
(using either "standard" call forwarding or a call forking/paralleling feature 
like Avaya's EC500 or Cisco's Single Number Reach), we send the call with the 
SIP FROM header of the original caller (which is desirable to preserve 
callerID).  We also include a Diversion Header with one of our phone numbers 
(the original destination of the call).

We're being billed based on the *original* calling number, which sometimes 
results in long distance charges, even if this leg of the call is local to us.  
This is particularly onerous if the inbound call is international!

So, the question is- what *should* we be billed on: FROM or DIVERSION.

At one point, the provider indicated that P-Charge-Info was supported, but now 
backing away from that.

Do we have any recourse (technical or otherwise)?

Thanks.

    This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain 
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have 
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete 
the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Unauthorized 
interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. We reserve 
the right, when permitted by law, to scan electronic communications, including 
e-mail and instant messaging, for the purposes of security and compliance with 
our internal policy.
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Reply via email to