Inteliquent has several products: Outbound IXC termination - good for sending translated toll free calls. They give you money for sending the calls. LTS - inbound and outbound local/local toll exchange with inteliquent members. Not an A-Z product, but the cheapest way to send calls to tmo/comcast/etc. You get the calls back through this too. IXC terminating inbound - they become the tandem of record in the LERG for your interlata traffic. I think they give you a cut of the tandem transit fee they charge IXCs but it's been a while since I read the contract. AIA - outbound LD product, not A-Z - super competitive rates to on-net carriers and a few others they get a deal on. If someone else uses this, it comes in the IXC terminating inbound and you bill inteliquent's CIC for the inbound inter carrier compensation where applicable. They make their money in not having to pay the tandem transit and other crap that an IXC would ordinarily pay to terminate, but they still pay the terminating carrier's inter carrier comp.
Local interconnection service - mostly for interconnected voip. You use their switches too interconnect. Not cheaper than doing it yourself, unless you don't already have a TDM switch and SS7 links and transport. If you lack either of the 3, it can work out financially. -Paul > On Aug 9, 2019, at 5:42 PM, Mike Hammett <voice...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > I wanted to note that I am still interested in working with competitive > tandem providers for "on-net" calls... calls among their customers, without > ever hitting an ILEC tandem. > > Also, now that I look at their web page... it says it allows me to receive > both local and long distance calls using that service... which seems to > conflict with what the sales guy told me. *sigh* > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com <http://www.ics-il.com/> > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > > > > From: "Mike Hammett" <voice...@ics-il.net> > To: "VoiceOps" <voiceops@voiceops.org> > Sent: Friday, August 9, 2019 2:42:37 PM > Subject: [VoiceOps] Connecting to Remote Tandems > > I'm evaluating methods of extending our footprint. I purposely left out > company names. > > One of the companies we talked to was really only interested in getting us > the inbound long distance calls, not the local ones. Well, they would, but > the terms were vastly different. > > Given that I still need to build out to connect to the local tandem, what's > the point in using a third party to connect to long distance? > > Are the terms for connecting to the local tandems different because the > access tandem is simpler, whereas the local tandem could potentially involve > connections to a bunch of other switches, once volume dictated I needed > direct connections... and they don't want to deal with that? > > Are there third parties that don't have vastly different terms for local > tandem services? > > Also, is it likely that I just don't understand what's going on? I went > circles with the sales rep to make sure I understood what he was saying, but > I could be wrong. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org <mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops>
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
