T-Mobile is using PA certificates, I'm passing live traffic with them right 
now. What I've heard so far intercarrier is just Comcast (private cert), 
T-Mobile (STI-PA cert), Twilio (not sure), and us (STI-PA cert). Verizon and 
AT&T have just been doing private interconnect from what I understand.


-Paul


________________________________
From: VoiceOps <voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org> on behalf of Dave Frigen 
<dfri...@wabash.net>
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 3:49 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Production STIR/SHAKEN


Paul, this is in reply to your question posted on July 24th: Currently there 
are 34 active STI-GA SHAKEN participants authorized to exchange SHAKEN tokens 
in the U.S. While Canada and the UK are working on SHAKEN, to my knowledge 
there are no PA’s or CA’s to operate and approve new applicants in those 
countries.



T-Mobile, Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T were the first four carriers to adopt 
SHAKEN and are still temporarily using self-signed certificates (not official 
PA authored certificates that Transnexus and the rest of the U.S. uses). This 
is due to FCC expectations of having a SHAKEN platform in production at the 
beginning of the year and there not being a PA (Policy Administrator), nor any 
CA’s (Certificate Authorities) at that time. Self-signing certificates were the 
only means of operating the SHAKEN platform in the FCC timeframe. We, as 
out-of-band (OOB) operators do not have the ability to exchange certs. 
(certificates) with the self-signers today. It goes without saying that these 
networks are huge and not easily converted. T-Mobile and Comcast are in the 
process of converting to official PA authored certificates, they are expected 
to be on-line in the coming month. Both AT&T and Verizon are in the engineering 
stages and planning to convert in the future. I reside on a board seat of the 
national STI-GA governance board as an NTCA representative, and have asked the 
self-signers to begin publishing their self-signing root addresses so every can 
exchange tokens in the interim regardless of whether or not they are official 
PA authored certs. I anticipate self-signing certs going away, and likely 
within the coming months. In summary, we, as out-of-band (OOB) operators, do 
not have the ability to exchange certs. with the self-signers today, hopefully 
they will agree to publish their root certificate addresses soon.



I want to prequalify this next statement by congratulating any TDM provider 
that is adopting OOB or some sort of TDM SHAKEN technology. You’re doing the 
right thing, because TDM isn’t going away anytime soon. And all Americans 
deserve the right to have their calls officially authenticated and verified 
just like any iP network provider’s calls. OOB and other technologies for use 
on TDM calls for SHAKEN are in the infant stages and are just now being 
discussed and considered for permanent TDM standards. The body that is adopting 
new TDM standards is the PTSC Non-IP Call Authentication Task Force, led by 
ATIS. Anyone is welcome to become a member of the task force. There is a 
nominal $250 fee for organizations that are not already an ATIS member. If you 
want more information on how to join the committee, I’d be glad to help. 
Belonging to the committee is one of many ways to comply with the FCC’s mandate 
for TDM providers to adopt SHAKEN.



As to the original question of who to test OOB with, Transnexus to Transnexus 
will allow for both authentication and verification testing; or Transnexus to 
Netnumber or Neustar. These would be OOB to OOB calls. Regarding OOB to IP, or 
the reverse……it’s my understanding that OOB to in-band will only work one way 
today. OOB can authenticate a PA certificate that in-band can receive. HTTP 
Post software or a Call Placement Service (CPS) is required for an IP provider 
to post a token to an OOB provider. With that being said, Wabash is a 
Transnexus customer and would be more than happy to test OOB SHAKEN with any 
provider desiring to do so. Let me know and I’ll get you in touch with our 
engineers.



Lastly, I’d like to add that Wabash originally implemented OOB SHAKEN into a 
C-15 with no CapEx, just existing translations modifications. After running the 
Transnexus/ClearIP platform for a while, we decided to upgrade our SBC to a 
cloud solution for under $100 a month, but to date that is our only capital 
expense to be OOB SHAKEN enabled. So, don’t let your switch vendor insist that 
you break-the-bank to operate OOB.



Dave







Dave Frigen

Chief Operating Officer

Wabash Communications CO-OP | www.wabash.net

Office: 618.665.3311



[cid:image001.png@01D66409.4059F990]<https://www.facebook.com/wabashcommunicationscoop/>[cid:image002.png@01D66409.4059F990]<https://www.instagram.com/wabashcommunications/>[cid:image003.png@01D66409.4059F990]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWoo3wyybeYEnTpTxK2jbUg>
 [cid:image004.png@01D66409.4059F990] 
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/18788687/admin/>



[WabashCom_CO-OP_RGB.png]<http://www.wabash.net/>


_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Reply via email to