I built/ran a large meta shop for over a decade and still consult to many.
My $0.02 is they are on the backside of their market curve. Theres a
long tail on their customers but everything they do is replaceable by
software solutions that are increasingly open.
* Their CFS software hasnt seen a reasonable update to allow it to
meet current market needs in some time.
* The Cluster CFS architecture works well but is cluttered by clunky
management and lack of transparency and elasticity and ultimately
still orbits the CFS code limitations.
* Their EAS should have been retired in favor of a more reasonably
modern solution 5 years ago (more cohesive api's, better scaling, etc)
* The SBC didnt really need to happen, they entered that space after
the oracle acquisition of Acme. The level of engineering effort for
an org to install perimeta should be spent on acquiring
Kamailio/Opensips skills.
The future of Meta WAS going to be Clearwater, open IMS, which was
summarily killed by the MSFT buy, but the CFS code is a boat anchor
around the neck of communications provider product offerings as of 2021.
The legacy value of their TDM gateways is quite clear but it needn't be
in the context of a unified switch.
-Ryan
On 12/17/2021 11:15 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
We've been running Metaswitch for 15 years and are looking to refresh
what we have.
Who else operates at that tier? I'm talking to Ribbon. I'm hesitant to
talk to to Broadsoft because they're part of Cisco, but if I should, I
should...
Obviously, there are rather limited venues to gain third-party
feedback on the platforms, so I figured I'd ask here.
Thanks.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
