I was thinking if carriers didn't do one they wouldn't do the other. Are
you thinking that they may report TNs in the Re-assigned Number database
but still leave all their TNs in NPAC? I can see how that would cause
problems for the iconectiv's PortData service. Unless they have a way to
identify discrepancies between the RND and NPAC it would be useless.
MARY LOU CAREY
BackUP Telecom Consulting
Office: 615-791-9969
Cell: 615-796-1111
On 2022-04-04 07:49 PM, Calvin Ellison wrote:
I can't speak for every carrier, but I do know from experience that
not everyone updates NPAC when numbers are disconnected. I know of
CLECs that only ever programmed their 1K blocks and handled the
Assign/Disconnect/Age/Available lifecycle internally.
Calvin Ellison
Systems Architect
[email protected]
+1 (213) 285-0555
[1]
[2] [3] [4] [5]
The information contained herein is confidential and privileged
information or work product intended only for the individual or entity
to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify me immediately.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 12:37 PM Mary Lou Carey
<[email protected]> wrote:
iconectiv has a service called "PortData Comply for Marketers" that
you
can get access to. They also offer "PortData Source for Law
Enforcement"
and "PortData Validate". These services require a subscription to
the
NPAC database, but you don't have to be a service provider to get
them.
As long as you're a Provider of Telecom Related Services (PTRS) or a
service bureau you can qualify.
MARY LOU CAREY
BackUP Telecom Consulting
Office: 615-791-9969
Cell: 615-796-1111
On 2022-04-04 11:07 AM, Calvin Ellison wrote:
More data for our Call Analytics/Anti-Robocall Filter: the
Reassigned
Numbers Database. In our case, we'd want to use this for real-time
call analytics on every single ANI & DNIS that crosses our
network,
querying the database using to determine if a number should be in
Aging status (disconnected within the last 45 days).
I've asked our counsel how to "me too" this waiver. Although this
waiver calls out the "pull versus push argument", we'd need the
database on-premise in order to minimize post-dial-delay.
Is anyone interested in filing a joint waiver?
Calvin Ellison
Systems Architect
[email protected]
+1 (213) 285-0555
[1]
[2] [3] [4] [5]
The information contained herein is confidential and privileged
information or work product intended only for the individual or
entity
to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify me
immediately.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
Date: Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 7:17 PM
Subject: waiver request for fees for reassigned number database
To: Calvin Ellison <[email protected]>
Hey Calvin, check this out:
https://www.neca.org/docs/default-source/wwpdf/public/33122hustle.pdf
Links:
------
[1] http://voxox.com
[2] https://www.facebook.com/VOXOX/
[3] https://www.instagram.com/voxoxofficial/
[4] https://www.linkedin.com/company/3573541/admin/
[5] https://twitter.com/Voxox
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Links:
------
[1] http://voxox.com
[2] https://www.facebook.com/VOXOX/
[3] https://www.instagram.com/voxoxofficial/
[4] https://www.linkedin.com/company/3573541/admin/
[5] https://twitter.com/Voxox
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
