How? I have no idea, all I can tell you is the experience we see. Maybe Fred's comment has some merit if Peerless is either allowing actual spam, or re-assigning numbers too quickly (for new numbers).
Your porting experience is something I haven't seen, but we haven't mass-moved numbers in a long time. If Peerless is the common denominator... Oh, wait, have you checked the attestation level for these calls? Are the calls with a Peerless DID going out via Peerless? On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:33 AM Dovid Bender <[email protected]> wrote: > How is Bandwidth on top of this? We currently have about 18k DID’s with > peerless. The issue is since most are DID’s that were allocated to > Peerless, even if we port them out they will still be spam. Two interesting > numbers come to mind > 1) My personal number (which I never use for CLI) was form RNK. I ported > the number to a LEC in NYC and then eventually to Peerless. Once RNK went > away the range it was in was re-assigned to Peerless. That number is listed > as spam. > 2) I have another personal number that started at Verizon and was ported > to Peerless. That number is NOT listed as spam. > > The short term solution seems to be to get DIDs whose range is not > defaulted as spam and then port them to Peerless/Telnyx etc. > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:16 Carlos Alvarez via VoiceOps < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> We've had a lot of numbers from thinQ show up as spam right away, and a >> small number from Bandwidth. Generally though, Bandwidth is pretty good on >> this. It's possible (not an accusation) that the aggregators are recycling >> numbers quickly. We have a couple of customers who do legit outbound >> business dialing and get marked as spam, so they rotate a lot of numbers. >> This creates the problem if we or our carrier were to sell any of those to >> others too soon. >> >> I don't know what your volume is, but for us Bandwidth was far less >> expensive than Telnyx. Around 8k DIDs and half a million minutes. Pretty >> small, but within the BW minimums. >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:04 AM Dovid Bender via VoiceOps < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We primarily purchase numbers from Telnyx and Peerless. Lately any >>> number that we purchase is automatically listed as spam. I searched through >>> both of their stocks for random numbers in random area codes (50+ numbers) >>> and every time Hiya says it's likely SPAM. I presume they are marking any >>> carrier where it's easy to get numbers spam. Has anyone fought back against >>> this or are people just going with larger carriers like inteliquent/VZ etc? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Dovid >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> VoiceOps mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> VoiceOps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >> >
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
