Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Islam:

   [1]Bjorn Staerk has a good rejoinder to some anti-Muslim extremist
   nonsense -- obvious stuff at one level, but still worth repeating.
   (Thanks to [2]InstaPundit for the pointer.)

   I take it that few of us would claim anything much about what all
   Christians think, or even what the overwhelming majority of Christians
   thinks about particular political or moral topics (other than perhaps
   at the most general level, or about topics on which there's very broad
   agreement among Christians and non-Christians alike).

   The categorical generalization about what all or even nearly all
   Christians believe is clearly unsound. The statistical arguments may
   theoretically be accurate, but in practice this data is hard to
   collect: Our sense of what most people of group X think is often based
   on highly unrepresentative samples (e.g., those Xs we know, or those
   who are especially loud, or even those who live in our country rather
   than elsewhere). It also often does not distinguish between very
   different flavors of a political belief and intensities of that belief
   -- for instance, knowing how many members of some group "oppose
   abortion" tells us rather little about their specific policy views, or
   the intensity of those views.

   You might think that knowing someone's religion, at the coarse level
   of Christianity, Islam, and the like, would indeed tell you a good
   deal about his actual moral beliefs. But it turns out not to be so.
   It's not so for Christianity, and as best I can tell it's equally not
   so for Islam (or even for smaller religions such as Judaism). There
   may be a few exceptions; I can confidently guess, for instance, that
   most Christians oppose laws banning Christianity. But those really are
   exceptions.

   As a result, it makes little sense to say, for instance, "Christianity
   is a religion of peace" or "Christianity is a religion of war," unless
   one is speaking about theoretical aspirations about what the religion
   should be, rather than describing how Christians actually act, have
   acted, and are likely to act. It seems to me the same is true for
   Islam.

   I should stress that I think it's perfectly proper for people to
   criticize religious beliefs and religious movements, just as it's
   proper for people to criticize any ideology. But broad criticisms
   about how Islam is this or Christianity is that -- again, with a very
   few exceptions -- are almost always based on inaccurate
   overgeneralizations.

References

   1. http://www.bearstrong.net/warblog/000764.html
   2. http://instapundit.com/archives/017230.php

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to