Posted by Jacob T. Levy:
Newly posted:

   The paper I've been writing this summer instead of blogging (where are
   my priorities?) is [1]now online.

     "Beyond Publius: Montesquieu, liberal republicanism, and the
     small-republic thesis" 

     Abstract: The idea that republicanism as a form of government was
     only suitable for small states, given its definitive 18th-century
     formulation by Montesquieu, rested in that formulation on three
     major pillars: the difficulty of sustaining public-spirited virtue
     in the face of diversity of interests and inequality of fortunes;
     the problem of knowing the public interest when citizens'
     circumstances varied; and the danger posed to republican government
     by a large state's large armed forces. The first two worries
     declined as republican theory changed from classical and civic to
     modern and liberal, a change associated with Hume's and Publius'
     re-understanding of faction and interest in large republics. But
     Publius did not offer the only, or the final, defense of large
     republics. Other liberal republicans understood the problems
     differently, or denied that there as a problem at all. The
     intertwined problems of executive-legislative and civil-military
     relations, the worry that republicanism in large states would end
     in military rule � la Caesar, Cromwell, or Bonaparte, stimulated
     continuing work in constitutional theory decades after The
     Federalist. Accordingly, even among those who endorsed the new
     logic of faction, institutional remedies for the problems facing
     large republics remained, with particular dispute over federalism,
     the makeup of the executive, and the creation of a neutral or
     conservation-preserving power. This paper aims to broaden our view
     of the shift in republican constitutional thought beyond Hume and
     Publius; to bridge the Atlantic gap in our understanding of late
     18th-century constitutional thought; and to show the breadth of the
     rejection of civic republican assumptions as well as the range of
     thought about institutional design in the era.

References

   1. 
http://archive.allacademic.com/publication/getfile.php?file=supporting_docs/apsa_supporting_proceeding/2004-08-20/1188/apsa_supporting_proceeding_1188.pdf&PHPSESSID=18c6772b8ee63432d6bbcee4149ed0bf

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to