Posted by Eugene Volokh:
The Copyright Vampires Will Suck Your Blood,

   Stephen Bainbridge. [1]Stephen asks me whether he can get away with
   posting fan fiction that crosses Elric of Melnibon� (created by
   Michael Moorcock) with Anita Blake (of Laurell Hamilton's Anita Blake,
   Vampire Hunter series).

   I'd counsel against it. The fan fiction would use enough of the
   Moorcock and Hamilton material -- enough character attributes and
   allusions -- to constitute "copying" for copyright purposes (even if
   the only things that they literally copy are the names).

   To avoid liability, Stephen would have to argue fair use. But while
   parody that pokes fun at the original, or otherwise comments on it, is
   often a fair use (see the 2 Live Crew case, Campbell v. Acuff-Rose),
   parody that simply uses the original to poke fun at something else is
   generally not a fair use. Thus, for instance, the Ninth Circuit held
   that an item about the O.J. trial that borrowed from Dr. Seuss
   infringed the Seuss copyright, because it commented on O.J. but not on
   Dr. Seuss. And while one can often argue that any use of someone
   else's work (especially a humorous use of a serious work) in some way
   comments on the original, the Ninth Circuit case shows that courts are
   often skeptical of such arguments. It sounds like Stephen may be
   trying to mock Hamilton's work, but unless the submitted item comments
   (in a way that the court will recognize) on both Hamilton and
   Moorcock, then he's in trouble.

   Finally, note that this analysis relies on the fact that Stephen's
   blog has advertising, and thus would be treated as commercial, which
   is a big strike against a fair use. Parody and commentary that
   critique the original may be fair use even if they're commercial; and
   other uses may be fair use if they're noncommercial. But if a court
   rejects the parody/commentary argument and the use is commercial, then
   the fair use claim becomes quite weak.

   All this is just a general answer. It's hard to tell for sure if one
   hasn't seen the actual work, and with fair use it's hard to tell for
   sure even after one has seen the actual work. Still, I'd warn my
   colleague off his plan -- at least unless he insists that the
   submitted fiction pretty clearly mock both Moorcock and Hamilton.

References

   1. http://www.professorbainbridge.com/2004/12/an_anita_blake_.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to