Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Warning to Delawareans:

   Delaware Code title 11, � 770 sets the age of consent at 16, but at 18
   if the perpetrator is over age 30. Now I see some sense in "Romeo and
   Juliet" statutes that legalize (for instance) sex between 16-year-olds
   and 17-year-olds, or even 16-year-olds and 20-year-olds, but bar sex
   between 16-year-olds and 20-year-olds. I suppose the theory there
   would be that when people are closer in age, the relationship is less
   likely to be exploitative or casual; I'm not sure whether this is
   right, but it's at least plausible.

   Still, does it make sense to have the cutoff be age 30? I can
   understand people concluding that once a girl reaches 16, she ought to
   be able to make her own decisions. I can understand them concluding
   that girls aren't mature enough to make decisions until they're 18. I
   can understand them saying that sex when the age gap is four or fewer
   years is different than when the age gap is twelve years. But if you
   let 28-year-olds have sex with 16-year-olds, what's the point of
   barring 30-year-olds from doing the same?

   I realize the "he could be old enough to be her father" situation may
   seem icky to some people, but I don't see that as reason enough to
   draw a legal distinction here. (Incidentally, the statute has a
   separate provision outlawing sex with 16- or 17-year-olds by a person
   who "stands in a position of trust, authority or supervision over the
   child, or is an invitee or designee of a person who stands in a
   position of trust, authority or supervision over the child.")

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to