Posted by Eugene Volokh:
<a href="http://slate.com/id/2112170/";>Bushism of the Day</a> at <i>Slate</i>:

   Here's today's item:

     "We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health
     care field. We need to have our medical records put on the
     I.T."--Collinsville, Ill., Jan. 5, 2005

   Here's the link that Slate provides to the President's full speech, so
   readers can get some context:

   Oh, wait, Slate, one of the leading online journals, doesn't actually
   provide links to the full speech, even when it's on the Web, and even
   when curious readers might want to know how the quote looks in
   context. But we at the Conspiracy deliver what Slate doesn't; here's
   [1]the link.

   In any case, what exactly is "Bushistic" about the quote? "I.T."
   stands for "information technology," in this case presumably
   computers, networking, and the like -- a subset of one definition of
   "[2]technology," which is "Electronic or digital products and systems
   considered as a group." I can't say that "We need to have our medical
   records put on the [information technology]" is the most eloquent
   phrase in the English language. Maybe it's something of a slip -- "put
   on the technology" is not quite idiomatic, though it's clearly
   understandable, and probably technically correct given the definition
   I quoted. And in context, it seems to be an ordinary, if bland, part
   of an ordinary if bland political speech:

     To improve health care in America, we need to expand the use of
     health savings accounts. (Applause.) It's a product that lets you
     save tax-free for routine medical care while keeping affordable
     coverage against major illness. Small businesses must be allowed to
     join together, to pool risk, so they can buy insurance for their
     employees at the same discounts that big businesses are able to do.
     (Applause.)

     To address the cost of medical care, we need to apply 21st century
     information technology to the health care field. We need to have
     our medical records put on the IT. We need to make sure that we
     speed up the delivery and arrival of cheaper generic drugs to help
     control costs. We want to make sure our Medicare system still
     allows seniors to have choice in the system.

   Look, I've got to admit: Some Bushisms ("misunderestimated,"
   "strategery") are funny and somewhat unusual malapropisms. But "We
   need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care
   field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T."? Is that
   funny? To the extent that it's misspeaking, is it particularly
   uncommon and noteworthy? (As I've mentioned before, I hate to read
   transcripts of my own presentations, because they often have
   grammatical and word choice lapses -- and I think that's true for the
   overwhelming majority of all people, including the educated and
   intelligent.)

   And, to get back on my hobbyhorse, when Slate is trying to make a big
   deal out of a quote, why not include a link back to the quote so that
   readers can see it and its context for themselves?

References

   1. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/01/20050105-4.html
   2. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=technology

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to